Friday, April 30, 2021

Dog rescues another dog from drowning in pool

Dog rescues another dog from drowning in pool

A family’s beloved pet dog nearly drowned after falling into a backyard pool when the owners weren’t home. Fortunately, another dog was around who noticed the problem and saved the day.

The incident happened at a home in Boksburg City in South Africa, Southwest News Service (SWNS) reports. Byron Thanarayen, the pets’ owner, told the news outlet that he and his wife were initially confused when they returned home and found the dogs wet.

HERO DOG RESCUES OWNER FROM KNIFE-WIELDING MUGGER: ‘MY LITTLE LIFESAVER’

“We tried to look for clues as to where he could have wet his head,” he told SWNS. “We thought maybe he dipped his head in the water, but there was no mess in the house to support this suggestion.”

The incident happened at a home in Boksburg City in South Africa.

The incident happened at a home in Boksburg City in South Africa. (iStock)

The family decided to check their security cameras, which is when they discovered that the smaller dog, Chuky, had fallen into the pool. Fortunately, the larger dog, Jessie, was nearby and worked to lift Chucky to safety.

“It was heart-wrenching to watch,” Thanarayen said. “We still struggle to watch that video today, just thinking of what could have happened if Jessie was not there.”

It reportedly took Jessie 34 minutes to successfully lift Chucky out of the pool. Apparently, the smaller dog’s wet fur kept causing it to fall out of Jessie’s mouth.

FOLLOW US ON FACEBOOK FOR MORE FOX LIFESTYLE NEWS

Thanarayen continued, “I’m really proud of her, considering she is the youngest. Our dogs know how to swim but they always swim with us and not when we are not with them.”

Since this incident occurred, the family has said that they are installing a fence around the pool.


>>>>

Dozens killed, some decapitated, in suspected rebel attack in the Democratic Republic of Congo

Dozens killed, some decapitated, in suspected rebel attack in the Democratic Republic of Congo

Forty-six people from the ethnic Pygmy group were killed — some of them decapitated — on Wednesday in a suspected militant attack in northeast Democratic Republic of Congo, according to an NGO official based in the central African country.

An armed group shot civilians and decapitated others with machetes in Ambedi, a village in Irumu territory in Ituri province, said Christophe Munyanderu, regional coordinator for the NGO Convention pour le respect de droit de l’homme, or Convention for the Respect of Human Rights.
A spokesman for the Armed Forces of the DRC in Ituri attributed the attack to the Allied Democratic Forces, a rebel group that operates in the region. Two of the assailants were arrested and are currently under interrogation, the spokesman said.
Most of the victims were women and children, said Rachel Taruwayo, the regional coordinator for the provincial government.
Munyanderu said that a Pygmy who was hunting during the attack determined the death toll. When he returned to the village, Munyanderu said, he found a female survivor with a gunshot wound and a two-year-old child whose hand had been chopped off.
On Thursday, they reached a police post about 20 kilometers (12 miles) from the scene of the attack and were taken to a hospital. The woman and child are now out of danger, said David Dedonga, a doctor at Bwanasura hospital.
The ADF has intensified its attacks against civilians in the eastern provinces of the DRC in recent years, the United Nations said in July. These attacks have left more than 1,000 dead between January 2019 and June 2020 and may amount to war crimes and crimes against humanity, according to the UN.
The group has battled governments in East Africa since the 1990s and has ties to several international jihadi groups.

>>>>

New medical report may shed light on Adama Traoré’s death in police custody

New medical report may shed light on Adama Traoré's death in police custody

Paris The family lawyer for Adama Traoré, a Black Frenchman who died while being apprehended by Paris police in 2016, says a new medical report supports the possibility that Traoré’s death was linked to police treatment during the arrest.

The report​, which was commissioned by judges examining the case, concluded that the 24-year-old’s death was due to heat stroke that could have been aggravated by the gendarmes’ maneuvers, Traoré family lawyer Yassine Bouzrou said.
The report has not been made public and CNN has not seen the full report.
    According to Bouzrou, the report found that Traoré’s immobilization and handcuffing likely contributed to his asphyxiation.
    The new medical report was commissioned in July 2020, the latest in a succession of conflicting reports on the cause of Traoré’s death.
    A 2018 medical assessment requested by Traoré’s family found that he likely died of positional asphyxia induced by the gendarmes’ restraint method.
    In contrast, a later judge-mandated medical report instead attributed his death to pre-existing health conditions, which his family says Traoré didn’t have.
    The three police officers who detained Traoré maintain their innocence, and have not been formally investigated. ​
    In a press release, the officers’ lawyers confirmed that the new report identified Traoré’s principal cause of death as heat stroke and that it found that their clients’ “momentary constraining maneuvers” could have contributed to the “multifactorial situation” preceding his death.
    However, the release also says that the report ruled out positional asphyxia.
    The officers’ lawyers have also asserted that Traoré was resisting arrest, a claim his family disputes.
    Traoré died on his 24th birthday in the suburbs of Paris. Last June, thousands of people took to the streets of the French capital to demand justice for him, drawing parallels to the death of George Floyd, the Black American who died died as a police officer knelt on his neck during an arrest in Minneapolis.
      Traoré’s sister, Assa Traoré, has said that she believes race played a part in his arrest — a claim the officers’ lawyers have previously denied.
      “My brother died because he was Black. My brother died because he was from a disadvantaged area,” she told CNN last summer. “Would the body of a White man have received the weight of three policemen?”

      >>>>

      North Carolina woman is accused of using her $149,000 Covid-19 relief loan for shopping sprees

      North Carolina woman is accused of using her $  149,000 Covid-19 relief loan for shopping sprees

      As millions struggle to stay afloat during the Covid-19 pandemic, the last purchases on most minds are Louis Vuitton and diamonds.

      But in a state facing a 6.5% unemployment rate last August, one North Carolina woman allegedly used a $ 149,000 Covid-19 relief loan to purchase items at businesses including Louis Vuitton, Nordstrom, Neiman Marcus, IKEA and multiple diamond stores.
      Jasmine Johnnae Clifton, a 24-year-old Charlotte resident, appeared in federal court this week after being charged with two counts of fraud for using a business that had been dissolved to get Covid-19 relief funds, according to a release from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Western District of North Carolina.
      The loan was part of the CARES Act’s Economic Injury Disaster Loan Program. Funds were provided by the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) to North Carolina small businesses “suffering substantial economic injury” due to the pandemic, according to an SBA press release.
        Clifton did not respond to CNN requests for comment, and her public defender declined to comment due to the case’s pending status.

        Indictment: The loan was for a business that no longer existed

        Clifton first filed to create online clothing retail business Jazzy Jas LLC in February 2019 and applied for the SBA loan for the company on July 24, 2020, the indictment obtained by CNN says.
        The problem? According to the indictment, the company didn’t exist anymore. It had been formally dissolved with the North Carolina Secretary of State months earlier in March 2020, but effectively dissolved in September 2019.
        In order to get funding, Clifton allegedly submitted a loan application on July 24, 2020, falsely stating that Jazzy Jas LLC had generated $ 350,000 in revenue over a 12-month period prior to the pandemic, according to the indictment.
        “CLIFTON specifically agreed to use the loan proceeds for Jazzy Jas LLC ‘solely as working capital to alleviate economic injury caused by disaster occurring the month of January 31, 2020,'” the indictment states.
        A $ 150,000 loan was approved on August 8, 2020, and the indictment says the funds, minus a $ 100 fee, were deposited into Clifton’s credit union account about three days later.
        The indictment states that Clifton used Jazzy Jas LLC’s prior existence to “exploit a federal loan program and obtain a substantial cash sum.” The federal government seized approximately $ 50,000 in funds from Clifton’s credit union account in November, according to the indictment.
        A grand jury first indicted Clifton on February 17 for wire fraud in relation to a disaster benefit and fraud in connection with major disaster or emergency benefits. If found guilty, the press release stated that charges could lead to a maximum of 30 years in prison each and $ 1,250,000 total in fines.
        Clifton was released on a $ 25,000 bond following Monday’s court appearance, the court docket noted.

        U.S. attorney wants Covid-19 funds to help the right people

        Small businesses have particularly struggled to continue operating during the pandemic. Over 74% of small businesses reported experiencing either an overall moderate negative effect or large negative effect due to the Covid-19 pandemic, according to the most recent data available from the U.S. Census Bureau’s Small Business Pulse Survey, taken the week of January 4 to January 10, 2021.
          “At a time our nation is grappling with the effects of the coronavirus pandemic and businesses are struggling to cope with the impact of COVID, swindlers are seizing the opportunity to pilfer federal economic relief programs to line their own pockets,” U.S. Attorney Andrew Murray wrote in a statement sent to CNN.
          “My office is working hard to ferret out criminals who try to exploit the pandemic and steal funds intended for the economic recovery of businesses and communities across the Western District of North Carolina.”

          >>>>

          Mia Farrow addresses ‘vicious rumors’ about the past deaths of her children

          Mia Farrow addresses 'vicious rumors' about the past deaths of her children

          Mia Farrow is usually very private, but she is speaking out on the deaths of her three late children, Tam, Lark and Thaddeus.

          In the wake of the debut of HBO’s “Allen v. Farrow,” there has been online discussion about the decision not to address the deaths of three of Farrow’s adopted children in the docuseries. (HBO and CNN share parent company WarnerMedia.)
          Farrow posted a lengthy statement on her verified Twitter account Wednesday, writing that “Few families are perfect, and any parent who has suffered the loss of a child knows that pain is merciless and ceaseless.”
            “However, some vicious rumors based on untruths have appeared online concerning the lives of my three children,” she wrote. “To honor their memory, their children and every family that has dealt with the death of a child, I am posting this message.”
              She wrote that her daughter, Tam, died in 2000 at age 17 from an accidental prescription overdose, her daughter, Lark, died in 2008 at age 35 from complications of HIV/AIDS, and son, Thaddeus, died by suicide in 2016 at age 29.
                  Farrow referenced being the mother of 14 and grandmother of 16. She called the deaths of her three children “unspeakable tragedies.”
                  “Any other speculation about their deaths is to dishonor their lives and the lives of their children and loved ones,” she wrote.

                    >>>>

                    Why Trump is still a problem for the GOP establishment

                    Why Trump is still a problem for the GOP establishment

                    Our first CNN/SSRS poll since the insurrection of the Capitol contains mostly bad news for Republican President Donald Trump.

                    His approval rating (34%) is the lowest CNN’s ever recorded, and most Americans want Trump removed from office immediately.
                    But a look underneath the hood finds that Trump’s influence on the political scene is likely far from over. Many Republicans still like him, and he could be a figure to be reckoned with heading into 2022 and, yes, 2024.
                    Let’s start with the basic fact that Trump’s approval rating among Republicans in our poll stands at 80%. Other polls taken since the events of January 6 have similar ratings for Trump among Republicans, if perhaps a touch lower into the high 70s on average.
                    That 80% rating is certainly down from 94% before the election, but it’s still a very large percentage. It’s certainly a higher approval rating among his own party than the other presidents (Harry Truman, Richard Nixon and George W. Bush) who left office with an approval rating below 40% overall.
                    To give you some perspective, presidents who have approval ratings above 75% amongst the base have never faced a credible primary threat. In fact, every president who ran for another term with an approval rating above 60% within his own party won his party’s nomination.
                    A question in our poll that tries to get at Trump’s baseline support within the GOP reveals that there are a lot who don’t want to move on from him.
                    A large chunk (47%) say the party should continue to treat Trump as the leader of the GOP. That falls to 43% when you include Republican leaning independents, but, again, it’s a substantial portion. Just 19% of Americans, overall, want the party to continue to treat Trump as its leader.
                    Other recent polling points out that Republicans who go against Trump might not be able to escape his wrath in a 2022 or 2024 primary.
                    A quite high 57% of Republicans said in Ipsos KnowledgePanel poll that they agreed Trump should be the 2024 nominee. This included 37% who strongly agreed.
                    In other 2024 polling, Trump has continuously led the pack of named challengers. It does seem his support may have fallen off since the insurrection, but not tremendously. He’s still well out ahead with backing generally matching his 2016 primary performance of 45%.
                    Put another way, his position in very early hypothetical 2024 polling is at this point far better than other presidents after they lost their bid for another term (Gerald Ford for 1980, Jimmy Carter for 1984 and George H.W. Bush for 1996).
                    The polling, in this case, matches the reality you saw in the congressional vote to accept or reject the electoral votes from Pennsylvania, after the insurrection. A majority of Republican members of Congress chose to sustain the objection to those votes, despite no evidence that there was fraud that could have tipped the balance of the election in either Pennsylvania or any other state.
                    Indeed, the polling on the insurrection just gives you an understanding of how different the Republican base and the general electorate sees things right now.
                    While 65% of Americans place a great deal or moderate amount of blame on Trump “for the storming of the U.S. Capitol on January 6”, only 23% of Republicans do in our CNN poll. The vast majority of Republicans (76%) said little (20%) to no (56%) blame lies at the President’s feet.
                    The clear majority of Republicans (75%) say President-elect Joe Biden did not win enough votes to legitimately win the election, despite no evidence to make such a claim. Most Americans (65%) believe he did win legitimately.
                    And even as a majority of GOP members of Congress voted with no evidence to sustain the objection to Pennsylvania’s electoral votes, 51% of Republicans said in an ABC News/Washington Post poll that party leaders didn’t go far enough in supporting Trump’s bid to overthrow the election. Most Americans (52%) thought they went too far.
                    Therefore, it’s not surprising that, even as the majority of Americans (54%) in the CNN poll want Trump removed from office, a mere 10% of Republicans do. Other polling shows similarly.
                    The bottom line is that most Americans are ready to move on from Trump, but a lot of Republicans aren’t.
                    That could cause the party plenty of heartache. Under Trump, the party lost the House, Senate and the presidency. The party’s favorability rating has dropped over the past few months.
                    This puts the GOP party leaders in a bind. We already saw that low Republican turnout in the Georgia runoffs in areas most friendly to Trump cost Republicans. Functioning political parties cannot just ignore their base, even if what their base wants is in contrast to what the larger electorate does.
                    What Republicans need to hope is the party can unite, as most opposition parties do, around a common goal of defeating the majority party. You could see that working well in general elections.
                    Of course, that may not help out congressional Republicans who have defied Trump in a primary.

                    >>>>

                    Derek Chauvin, convicted in the murder of George Floyd, to be sentenced June 16

                    Derek Chauvin, convicted in the murder of George Floyd, to be sentenced June 16

                    Former Minneapolis Police officer Derek Chauvin, convicted this week in the murder of George Floyd last May, will be sentenced June 16, according to the court docket.

                    Judge Peter Cahill remanded Chauvin into custody on Tuesday following his conviction on second-degree murder, third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter.
                    He is being held until sentencing at a prison outside of Minneapolis.
                    The maximum sentence allowed under Minnesota law for second-degree unintentional murder is imprisonment of not more than 40 years. The maximum sentence for third-degree murder is imprisonment of not more than 25 years. The maximum sentence for second-degree manslaughter is 10 years and/or $ 20,000.

                    >>>>

                    Three skiers are missing after getting caught in a large avalanche in Colorado

                    Three skiers are missing after getting caught in a large avalanche in Colorado

                    Three skiers are missing after getting caught in a large avalanche between the Colorado towns of Silverton and Ophir, according to a preliminary report from the Colorado Avalanche Information Center.

                    The three belonged to a larger group of back-country skiers who were traveling Monday and triggered the avalanche in an area locally known as “The Nose.”
                    Four people were caught in the avalanche and fully buried in debris, the report said. One of the skiers was found and had sustained minor injuries, the report added.
                    Search-and-rescue operations for the other three lasted into Monday night and resumed Tuesday but were suspended that evening “due to avalanche hazard,” the report said.
                      The San Juan County Office of Emergency Management says the recovery mission for three missing skiers was suspended due to 'considerable' avalanche danger

                      “Efforts will resume when rescuers feel it is (safe) to access the site,” it added.
                      Even though the recovery mission has been temporarily suspended, the identities of the three skiers is “still pending per San Juan County Coroner’s Office investigation,” the San Juan County Office of Emergency Management wrote in a post on Facebook.”
                        “Avalanche danger in the back country is always unpredictable regardless of your avalanche knowledge and skills. It is critical to check the avalanche forecast and avalanche danger prior to venturing into the backcountry,” the office wrote.
                        “Check the Colorado Avalanche Information Center (CAIC) for avalanche conditions, have your equipment of beacon, shovel, probe and make a plan for communications with your ski group.”

                        >>>>

                        Lizzo reveals Chris Evans responded to her drunk DM: ‘God knows I’ve done worse’

                        Lizzo reveals Chris Evans responded to her drunk DM: 'God knows I've done worse'

                        Over the weekend, the “Truth Hurts” artist revealed on TikTok that she sent a message to Evans while after she had been drinking.

                        The message in question was a trio of emojis including a gust of wind, a woman playing basketball and a basketball. The implication behind the emojis was that she was shooting her shot at flirting with the actor. 

                        “Don’t drink and DM, kids…. for legal porpoises [sic] this is a joke,” she captioned the brief video.

                        LIZZO DISCUSSES ‘MERCIALIZED’ BODY POSITIVITY MOVEMENT: ‘WE HAVE TO MAKE PEOPLE UNFORTABLE AGAIN’

                        On Sunday, Lizzo took to the app again to reveal that Evans had responded to her and showed off the fact that he is following her on Instagram. 

                        Lizzo revealed that Chris Evans responded to her drunk DM on TikTok.

                        Lizzo revealed that Chris Evans responded to her drunk DM on TikTok. (Getty Images)

                        “No shame in a drunk DM [face-throwing-a-kiss emoji] god knows I’ve done worse on this app lol [facepalm emoji],” Evans allegedly responded.  

                        After showing the response she got from the actor for shooting her shot, Lizzo is seen in her TikTok video dancing, shaking and seemingly being overjoyed to have successfully slid into his DMs. 

                        LIZZO BARES ALL IN AMERICAN FLAG OUTFIT AS SHE ENCOURAGES VOTERS TO ‘STAY IN LINE’ AT POLLS ON ELECTION DAY

                        Although he didn’t specify say it, the “Knives Out” actor was likely referencing his infamous social media gaffe when he accidentally leaked a graphic photo of his penis back in September 2020.

                        CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR ENTERTAINMENT NEWSLETTER

                        According to E! News, Evans posted a pre-recorded video on his Stories but when it ended, the image showed a photo grid, giving viewers a very brief look at his recent snaps. Among the photos appeared to include some NSFW images, including one that many of his millions of followers believe to be an erect penis.

                        The actor seemingly copped to the gaffe soon after, using the heightened attention the moment gave his Twitter account to encourage people to vote in the November elections.


                        >>>>

                        How to watch tonight’s presidential debate

                        How to watch tonight's presidential debate

                        Washington Democratic nominee Joe Biden and President Donald Trump are scheduled to face off tonight in the first general election presidential debate of 2020.

                        Here’s everything you need to know about how to watch the debate.

                        What time is the debate?

                        The debate will take place from 9 p.m. to 10:30 p.m. ET.

                          Where can I watch it?

                          The debate will air live on CNN, CNN en Español and CNN International.
                          It will stream live in its entirety, without requiring log-in to a cable provider, on CNN.com’s homepage, across mobile devices via CNN’s apps for iOS and Android, and via CNNgo apps for Apple TV, Roku, Amazon Fire, Chromecast and Android TV.
                          You can also follow CNN’s live debate coverage on CNN.com

                          Who is moderating?

                          Chris Wallace of Fox News is moderating Tuesday’s debate.

                          What topics will be covered?

                          Wallace selected the following topics for the first debate: “The Trump and Biden Records,” “The Supreme Court,” “Covid-19,” “The Economy,” “Race and Violence in our Cities,” and “The Integrity of the Election,” according to the Commission on Presidential Debates.

                          What is the format of the debate?

                          The candidates will not have opening statements, and Trump will receive the first question from the moderator. Each segment will last about 15 minutes, and the candidates will have two minutes to respond after the moderator opens each segment with a question. Wallace will then use the rest of the time in the segment to facilitate further discussion on the topic, according to the commission.

                          Where is the debate taking place?

                          The debate is taking place at Case Western Reserve University and Cleveland Clinic in Cleveland.

                          Will there be a live audience?

                          Yes, but the size of the audience will be limited compared to previous debates. Frank Fahrenkopf, co-chairman of the Commission on Presidential Debates, has estimated that 60 to 70 audience members would be seated in the debate hall Tuesday night. Everyone attending will undergo testing for Covid-19 and follow other health safety protocols

                          Who is hosting the debate?

                          The Commission on Presidential Debates is a nonpartisan nonprofit organization and has sponsored all general election presidential and vice presidential debates since 1987. The CPD does not receive funding from the government or any political party or campaign, according to the organization.

                          How many more debates will there be?

                          Biden and Trump will debate each other two more times this election cycle, on October 15 and 22. Kamala Harris and Mike Pence will debate next Wednesday, October 7, at the single vice presidential debate.

                            How many days until Election Day?

                            As of Tuesday, it is 35 days until Election Day (Tuesday, Nov. 3).

                            >>>>

                            This is how a thunderstorm produces a tornado

                            This is how a thunderstorm produces a tornado

                            Tornadoes are one of Earth’s most violent forces of nature. They have occurred in all 50 states and have been spotted throughout the year. While they are most common in the United States, tornadoes can occur all over the globe.

                            While great strides have been made in the study of tornadoes, there’s still so much we don’t know about them. They have been studied immensely during the last few decades to learn what causes them and how they form.
                            CNN meteorologist Brandon Miller, who is also a storm chaser, has been following and studying these storms since 2005.
                              “Something you learn from studying tornadoes, especially in the field, is that there is no perfect formula for forming a tornado — every storm is unique,” says Miller.
                                An aerial view from a drone shows tornado damage to homes on March 26, 2021, in Newnan, Georgia. According to reports, an EF-4 rating tornado passed through the region.

                                “Sometimes, it may appear that a storm is in a perfect environment for a tornado to form, yet it never does. Conversely, tornadoes frequently form in marginal environments where it seems like one or more ‘ingredients’ to storm formation is missing or lacking,” says Miller.
                                  While there’s no perfect formula as to which storms will produce tornadoes, there’s commonality in the anatomy of the systems that result in tornadoes.
                                  There are even signs you can see that will help you understand the life cycle of a developing storm that could produce a tornado.

                                    The development of a thunderstorm

                                    As a thunderstorm develops, air rises, helping the cloud grow taller and taller.

                                    As warm air rises, clouds begin to grow taller and taller. This is the developing phase of the thunderstorm. You can see fluffy white cumulus clouds grow taller with your own eyes. This is before you see rain or hear thunder.
                                    As the clouds grow, you will notice the bottom of the cloud darkening. You will many times see the very top of the cloud flattening out, creating an anvil shape that protrudes from the top of the cloud.
                                    This indicates very cold air at the top of the cloud and could be a precursor to the possibility of hail.

                                    When a thunderstorm becomes a supercell

                                    As the storm matures, it could become what’s known as a supercell. A supercell is a rotating thunderstorm.
                                    “Nearly all supercells produce some sort of severe weather (large hail or damaging winds) but only 30 percent or less produce tornadoes,” says the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
                                    Cold air rushing out of the storm cloud, producing a gust front.

                                    During this mature phase of the thunderstorm or supercell; heavy rain, lightning, hail and very strong winds are expected.
                                    Sometimes, you will feel a strong gust of wind a few moments before the rain arrives. This is called a gust front. This is caused by cool air being forced down from the storm cloud. When the cold air hits the ground, it spreads out quickly, ahead of the storm. This is a sure sign that a storm is near.

                                    The formation of a tornado

                                    Tornadoes are usually formed from supercells. These supercells develop when there are several ingredients in place to help them thrive: instability, lift and wind shear.
                                    Within the supercell, wind shear becomes a crucial component to the storms development. Shear is when winds change directions with height. This creates spin within the thunderstorm cloud.
                                    Another force that’s acting inside the supercell is a downdraft. This is an area of drier air that is pushed down from the storm. As it’s forced down, it wraps around the backside of the storm.
                                    The updrafts and downdrafts work in tandem to pull the horizontal column of air down to form the tornado. This vertical column of air is called a funnel cloud until it touches the ground — at that point it becomes a tornado.
                                    “The most telltale sign that a tornado could be forming, when you are looking at a close-range severe thunderstorm, is the ‘wall cloud,'” says Miller.
                                    The wall cloud is a lowering of the cloud base that will lead to the vortex, or spinning of air.
                                    When this rotating column of air touches the ground, a tornado has formed.
                                    The presence of a wall cloud doesn’t always mean a tornado will form, but it certainly ups the odds. “You will know you are looking at a wall cloud because it will hang noticeably lower than the rest of the thunderstorm and you may notice it is rotating if you look closely,” says Miller.

                                    Tornadoes have produced the strongest winds recorded on Earth

                                    Most tornadoes are relatively small and short-lived, and can still be dangerous and cause damage. However, more violent tornadoes can be more than a mile wide and stay on the ground for more than an hour. This is because they have much more momentum than the smaller tornadoes, making them harder to stop.
                                    A  tornado cuts its way through a field in Minneola, Kansas, on May 24, 2016.

                                    Miller has witnessed roughly 15-20 tornadoes during his years storm chasing.
                                    “There is no denying that there is a certain amount of excitement that comes from seeing a tornado when you are set out with the intent of seeing one,” says Miller.
                                    “At the same time, you are balancing that excitement with a sizable amount of anxiety and concern over what the tornado could do, especially if there are residents in the immediate path of the storm. As someone who spent years studying, and many more years reporting on, tornadoes, it still gets all my nerves firing when you see a tornado in person.”
                                    Chealsea Zuchnic, 3, walks past the remains of a truck wrapped around a tree in front of the Zuchnic's destroyed home in Bridge Creek, Okla., on May 4,  1999.

                                      The smaller tornadoes have winds of 60-110 mph, while the more violent tornadoes can have winds from 160 to more than 200 miles per hour.
                                      The strongest winds ever recorded on Earth were from a tornado, on May 3, 1999, in Bridge Creek, Oklahoma at more than 300 mph.

                                      >>>>

                                      A new lawsuit calls Deshaun Watson a ‘serial predator.’ 14 lawsuits against him now allege sexual assault

                                      A new lawsuit calls Deshaun Watson a 'serial predator.' 14 lawsuits against him now allege sexual assault

                                      Houston Texans quarterback Deshaun Watson was called a “serial predator” in the latest of 14 lawsuits against him alleging sexual assault.

                                      As with almost all of the lawsuits, the new lawsuit said, “Watson’s behavior is part of a disturbing pattern,” but was the first to include, “Plaintiff believes Watson to be a serial predator.”
                                      Seven new lawsuits were filed in Harris County, Texas on Monday by attorney Tony Buzbee, who is representing the women. Buzbee filed seven lawsuits against Watson last week.
                                          After the first suit was filed, Watson denied those allegations in a statement posted to Twitter.
                                            “As a result of a social media post by a publicity-seeking plaintiff’s lawyer, I recently became aware of a lawsuit that has apparently been filed against me. I have not yet seen the complaint, but I know this: I have never treated any woman with anything other than the utmost respect. The plaintiff’s lawyer claims that this isn’t about money, but before filing suit he made a baseless six-figure settlement demand, which I quickly rejected. Unlike him, this isn’t about money for me — it’s about clearing my name, and I look forward to doing that,” the post said.
                                              Watson’s lawyer, Rusty Hardin, said Tuesday he and Watson recognize that sexual assault and harassment are unlawful and morally wrong, but he believes the allegations are false.
                                              “Opposing counsel has orchestrated a circus-like atmosphere by using social media to publicize 14 ‘Jane Doe’ lawsuits during the past seven days in a manner calculated to inflame the public and malign Deshaun’s otherwise sterling reputation,” Hardin had said in a statement Monday. “In addition, the tactic of refusing our requests to confidentially provide the names of the plaintiffs so we can fully investigate their claims makes uncovering the truth extremely difficult. Anonymity is often necessary as a shield for victims but opposing counsel has used it as a sword to publicly humiliate Deshaun before the truth‑seeking process can even begin.”
                                              “I believe that any allegation that Deshaun forced a woman to commit a sexual act is completely false,” Hardin said in the statement.
                                              Hardin also said that he has spoken with “many” massage therapists who have worked with Watson and “describe him as a gentleman and a model client who never engaged in inappropriate conduct.”
                                              The seven new lawsuits filed Monday describe incidents that allegedly took place from April 2020 to March 2021 in Houston, Atlanta and Beverly Hills.
                                              Five of the lawsuits were filed by massage therapists or people allegedly hired to give a massage. One of the lawsuits was filed by an esthetician and another by a woman who “offers various wellness therapy services.”
                                              All of the new lawsuits allege Watson “assaulted and harassed” the women by “exposing himself” or “touching (them) with his penis.”
                                              One of them additionally alleges Watson tried to make the accuser perform oral sex on him.
                                              All seven lawsuits allege the women were contacted by Watson via Instagram.
                                              Houston police posted a statement on Twitter on Friday that said no incident reports have been filed in its jurisdiction and the department “is unaware of any contact between HPD and Houston attorney Tony Buzbee regarding the allegations contained in his recently filed lawsuits.”
                                              On Saturday, Buzbee posted on Instagram, “Our team will be submitting affidavits and evidence from several women, who had experiences with Deshaun Watson, to the Houston Police Department (HPD) and the Houston District Attorney, on Monday morning. We will request that a grand jury be empaneled to consider the evidence we provide.”
                                                Houston Police spokesperson Jodi Silva told CNN Monday she couldn’t say whether anything had been turned over to HPD, and she wasn’t aware of anyone from HPD speaking with Buzbee or Watson.
                                                The Houston DA’s office did not respond to CNN’s request for comment.

                                                >>>>